Originally posted by dermotmccarthy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Future of the Heineken Cup In Doubt?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X

Originally posted by dermotmccarthy View Post.
(Not directed at Dermot)My computer thinks I'm gay
What's the difference anyway
When all the people do all day
Is stare into a phone
Comment

Originally posted by sewa View PostSo France have 14 clubs with approx 56% French. 14 x 56= 784% (ignoring squad sizes), Ireland have 4 clubs with an average of about 90% 4 x 90 = 360%. The Frogs therefore have twice as many French pro players as Ireland have, killing the game? No your killing our heads with dumb misuse of stats
(Not directed at Dermot)A lion online, a lamb at home.
Comment

adding percentages might not give an accurate picture, but if you do some maths, sewa's statement of twice as many french players compared to Ireland, is correct.
if you take a match day squad of 23 multiply by 56%, then mulitply by 14 you would get 180 french qualiifed players.
for Ireland you get 83 players (23 x 90% x 4). 180/83 is 2.17
Comment

Originally posted by 5eight View PostWill gladly admit to not being a mathematician but how can you have 794% or 360% of anything. If the Top 14 clubs have an average of say 56% French qualified players then how can you arrive at a figure of 794% for the league as a whole. Adding percentages does not give an accurate picture.
Comment

Originally posted by Drick View Postadding percentages might not give an accurate picture, but if you do some maths, sewa's statement of twice as many french players compared to Ireland, is correct.
if you take a match day squad of 23 multiply by 56%, then mulitply by 14 you would get 180 french qualiifed players.
for Ireland you get 83 players (23 x 90% x 4). 180/83 is 2.17A lion online, a lamb at home.
Comment

Originally posted by Drick View Postadding percentages might not give an accurate picture, but if you do some maths, sewa's statement of twice as many french players compared to Ireland, is correct.
if you take a match day squad of 23 multiply by 56%, then mulitply by 14 you would get 180 french qualiifed players.
for Ireland you get 83 players (23 x 90% x 4). 180/83 is 2.17
And on the respective numbers of senior male players, it should be 5x.Ceterum censeo INM irrumandum esse.
Comment

Originally posted by sewa View PostSo France have 14 clubs with approx 56% French. 14 x 56= 784% (ignoring squad sizes), Ireland have 4 clubs with an average of about 90% 4 x 90 = 360%. The Frogs therefore have twice as many French pro players as Ireland have, killing the game? No your killing our heads with dumb misuse of stats
(Not directed at Dermot)Please support Milford Hospice. Click here to donate.
Comment

There are 737 Professional rugby players in France for 14 teams. The average is 53 rugbymen/team ( Toulon is the minimum with 47, and Grenoble is the maximum with 62). So basically 737x56%=412 or 413 french players.A few years ago when the English teams were a good force in Europe, the FFR complained that our championship's level was too weak. Now they complain there aren't enough french players. While the real reason for our bad results with the national side is, that the youth training in Marcoussis is poor. The structures are really good, but not the trainers. Most of them got somebody to pull a few strings for them to get the job. And finally, most of the lessons aren't even taught by the coaches, but by sport professors from the public service.Last edited by Jos; 2ndOctober2013, 09:58.
Comment

413 professional French players you say and thats only allowing for the top division, they also have another pro division below that (where incidentally a lot of our young talent also play due to us having no outlet for them). So the numbers are rapidly approaching a thousand pro players in all. Seems a very healthy situation compared to us or Wales. The comparison with Scotland and Italy would be scaryMy computer thinks I'm gay
What's the difference anyway
When all the people do all day
Is stare into a phone
Comment

Originally posted by 5eight View PostWill gladly admit to not being a mathematician but how can you have 794% or 360% of anything. If the Top 14 clubs have an average of say 56% French qualified players then how can you arrive at a figure of 794% for the league as a whole. Adding percentages does not give an accurate picture.My computer thinks I'm gay
What's the difference anyway
When all the people do all day
Is stare into a phone
Comment

Originally posted by sewa View PostIts statistics, not maths and actually I am a professionally qualified statistician (after a fashion) given that Stats and Chemometrics (another type of stats) were a 1/4 of my primary degree.
Comment

I think comparing it to Ireland isnt the benchmark.
Nz have 5 S15 rugby teams and 14 ITM/NPC with im guessing 85% minimum eligible for NZ. Its they're ability to have a domestic comp thats choc ful of kiwis...and the best feed into S15 and then into the national team.
That number of non eligible french players is sure to affect national team. Look at the out half position for starters.
Over the last few weekends 4 out of the Top 14 clubs have played a French fly half
Trinh Duc at Montpellier
Tales at Castres
Lopez at Perpignan *Hook has played huge amount at 10.
Bernard at Bordeaux.
Clermont (James) , Toulon (Wilko) Racing (Sexton) Toulouse (McAllister) Brive (Swanepoel), Stewart (Grenoble) ,Waenga (Biarritz) ,Brett (Bayonne), Urdapilleta (Oyonnax) and Morne Steyn impending arrival at Stade Francais.....are all starters at fly half.
Anyone watching 6n or international rugby knows the french have struggled at 10...and as far as im concerned the answer is in black and white.Last edited by NotreDameRFC; 2ndOctober2013, 11:17."Hell, I'm not saying I'm an angel, but when it came to dirty tricks I couldn't hold a candle to the Irish Mafia" Jimmy Hoffa
Comment

Originally posted by LondonMunster View PostIf it was 1/4 of your primary degree, might that make you 1/4 qualified statistician (which is 100% more qualified than me)? Just asking. Of possibly you are a 100% qualified statistician 25% of the time?
Getting back on topic the difference between France now and France back in the day is approach to risk / flair and discipline. Or to put it simply Laporte ruined French rugbyMy computer thinks I'm gay
What's the difference anyway
When all the people do all day
Is stare into a phone
Comment
Comment