Smearing the Tories? Do you want me to play tit-for-tat with some of Phoney Blair's nominees to the House of Lords?Originally Posted by the plastic paddy
(Presumably, if a child-abuser is found to be a Somerset CCC player or supporter, you'd have no problem in my doing the same thing? Aright so, let's start with Peter Roebuck!)
Baron Archer of Weston-Super-Mare is the inevitable clincher in that one.
Vorsprung durch Pfennig.
What a fragrant missus he had (has?) - there was a time when I definitely would have! And even more so if she had tipped me off in advance about certain movements in stock prices!
So many People involved, so many whispers, police complaints etc. Its obvious that many at the beeb knew, you would have thought that just someone would have said to herself/tory/labour/anyone...er "this might not be the best idea guv"
I dont care how much he raised for charity.one destroyed child isnt worth a hundred times what he raised....and dont forget it is insinuated in the mail that he did the charity work in order to escape further action.i dont know if thats true.i dont know enough about it tbh
I think a lot of people in england are finding it hard to come to terms with what has happened here, he was a national treasure after all.
If the lessons of history teach us anything it is that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
Don't know about that MF - everyone thought he was a bit of a creepy old freak even before the Louis Theroux doc, which buried him in terms of reputation.
There's not much of that sort of shock over here - in fact, people seem surprised that he got away with it rather than surprised he did it.
I think if it had broken 20 years ago it would have been very different.
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men" Edward R Murrow
"Little by little, we have been brought into the present condition in which we are able neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them." - Livy
latest is former Jim'll Fix It and TotP director says he repeatedly reported Saville's behaviour with young girls and is stunned BBC are saying they'd had no complaints.
On the knighthood, the creepiness aside, it seems like he was very good at compartmentalising his life to stop someone joining up the dots. Apparently that's why he had so many different homes. Whoever looked into him for the knighthood wouldn't have found anything for the same reason the papers didn't nail his bastard arse to the wall years ago, suspicion is one thing proof was much, much harder. Bearing in mind there is no "proof" now beyond people finally speaking out. Without that evidence there was nothing but a huge amount of (self publicising) charity work.
Last edited by Evil Omer; 12th-October-2012 at 19:45.
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
OD as you well know I don't do politics and i certainly won't be going into bat for labour or the f*cking liberals if they try and make this party political. But it can't be denied that Jimmy Saville was a big fan of Mrs Thatcher and his numerous invites to Chequers would indicate that the admiration was mutual. However the BBC has got plenty for which it has to answer, and the institution knows it full well.
As for Peter Roebuck, I always hated the man after the way he treated Viv but I would not wish his unravelling on anyone because I think he was (WRONGLY) a deeply haunted and shameful homosexual and not a child molester. It is very sad when a man ends up in a situation where the only route is suicide.
In the eighties, Thatcher f###ed the miners; in the eighties, Jimmy Saville ...........
'I am thankful for laughter, except when milk comes out of my nose' - Woody Allen
I had no idea of this. Furthermore, bearing in mind that Saville was of Yorkshire mining stock, I find it surprising that he would have been a Thatcher-lover - especially during the days when the red-haired Barnsley clown was helping her to destroy both the British coal industry and the NUM.
Saville was, by some accounts, strangely well connected. Frequent visitor to Chequers, Knight Commander of the Order of St Gregory, Knight of Malta.
At the same time, he claimed to have provided marriage counseling to Charles and Diana, which suggests a touch of the Walter Mitty as well.
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men" Edward R Murrow
"Little by little, we have been brought into the present condition in which we are able neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them." - Livy
Not sure really means as much as some make out, every political crook in the world has been well connected. For a reason. That's how they went about their crimes. According to one account Saville would cultivate important people. For example every time the senior local police structure changed he'd wine and dine the incoming senior officers. As with many abusers, he tried to ingratiate himself wherever possible to protect himself and open up opportunity.
Very good comment from Ian Hislop last night, all the people claiming they knew is suspicious. They heard the rumours doesn't mean they KNEW and if they did know then they should be investigated by the police for taking no action. As he pointed out, ultimately the only people who really knew were the victims, who tended to come from the kind of background where they weren't going to be believed and had enough problems in their life as it was. Again as with most abusers he preyed on the weak and vulnerable knowing that made it easier to do and easier to get away with.
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
It's the nature of the honours, EO. George Bush and Ronald Reagan are knights of Malta. You don't get in for doing fun runs.
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men" Edward R Murrow
"Little by little, we have been brought into the present condition in which we are able neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them." - Livy
Always thought you had to be a Catholic to be made up as a Knight of Malta, and to prove your Catholic identity back a number of Generations????
exactly my point, the fact Saville had honours doesn't really prove anything in terms of collusion, as some others have suggested
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
I'd disagree. He was a DJ and a charity fun runner. Those people don't often find themselves rubbing shoulders with ex Directors of the CIA at Knights of Malta get togethers, or being invited to chequers.
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men" Edward R Murrow
"Little by little, we have been brought into the present condition in which we are able neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them." - Livy
I don't think that description really covers him. He was a DJ (and a wrestler and a dance hall manager and a lot of things) originally. But by the time he got the honours he'd been throwing himself at every charity opportunity possible at every chance. Also fun runner probably doesn't get close to what he was, he was the first big charity runner and at an extended age as well. With hindsight he was a massive self publicist over every piece of "good work" he did. He courted people in high position - he was exactly the kind of big name who got honours.
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
Not really. Look at Thatcher's tame Tyke, Campbell avant la lettre, Bernard Ingham.
Vorsprung durch Pfennig.
On a related point......
Australia's first publicly accessible register of child sex offenders has been published online in the state of Western Australia.
Initially, the details available include photographs, names and physical descriptions of nine sex offenders the police have lost track of.
Parents will be also able to enter their addresses to see if there are any convicted paedophiles living nearby.
But there are concerns about possible vigilantism and mistaken identity.
The Western Australia government describes the register as a balancing act between community safety and the ability of the police to manage convicted paedophiles, says the BBC's Duncan Kennedy in Sydney.
But legal groups have questioned how useful it will be and raised concerns about the potential for vigilante attacks.
The Criminal Lawyers' Association said that authorities would find it hard to stop the pictures being illegally posted elsewhere on the internet.
But the government says it is an offence to republish any information from the site and said any reprisal attacks would not be accepted.
I realised I was dyslexic when I went to a toga party dressed as a goat
Surely if they're in breach of their bail conditions or any orders in place subsequent to finishing their sentence then identifying the 9 isn't so much public awareness as an appeal to find?
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
Agreed EO, but I think the fact that parents can check if paedophiles are living locally is likely to cause more focus with potential vigilantes etc using it
I realised I was dyslexic when I went to a toga party dressed as a goat
It is but you know what, being a parent, I don't care that much. Now don't get me wrong I don't want to see mob rule because it will go badly wrong and end up with innocent men being victimised, so just publishing half the details is a screw up. But I don't want paedophiles being allowed to live near children and by the nature of their "condition" **** 'em I don't feel sympathy or care if they live in a cesspit. Cruel possibly but I genuinely don't care. I'd love to come on here and theorise and pretend to be of a higher nature but it would be bull**** because the safety of children should come above all else. And another thing, while I'm at it, publish the details of the arseholes who let paedophiles loose in society. If a judge lets one off with a non-custodial sentence and they offend, lock the judge up as well, they're as much to blame.
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
He was catholic.
EO,
The dilemma I have is that if someone told me the guy across the road was an offender, I'd instantaneously move closer to a custodial sentence myself.
Publishing those details only makes it more likely that some sort of catastrophe takes place.
The answer, for me at least, is that child abusers should be indefinitely detained.
"We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven into an age of unreason if we dig deep into our history and remember we are not descended from fearful men" Edward R Murrow
"Little by little, we have been brought into the present condition in which we are able neither to tolerate the evils from which we suffer, nor the remedies we need to cure them." - Livy
Being a true liberal, I'd give them the option of indefinite detention, a year in Afghanistan or surgical castration.
As happened in the UK, when the NotW published names, pictures and addresses. And a mob ended up attacking a paediatrician's house.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...iles-here.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2000/au...ection.society
Vorsprung durch Pfennig.
There is no need for that language on a family forum T78.
Saw HIGNFY last night, mentioned the supposed 'episode' where they slate him, never happened, however they did show a clip where Ian Hislop asks Saville did he live in a mobile home, Saville says yes, for a number of years, Hislop asks 'What did he do there?' Saville in low voice relies, 'Anything i could get my hands on'
I totally 100% agree, some things shouldn't have a second chance. I mean seriously how do you rehabilitate someone from being a paedophile?
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
Move them to another parish?
that's what's happening now, just shipping it onto being someone else's problem (or worse just not caring)
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote