Ryan looked solid in the games he played. Cotter looked very good in the first 2 games but seemed to be under a bit of pressure on against saints but the saints pack are huge. Either one should be on the bench for Rabo games. Both are versatile in that they can play lh or th but Ryan seemed to struggle a small bit at tight last week in the A game.
Alan Cotter is on the bench for Bath tonight against Quins. Game is on Sky Sports 1 in case anybody wants to watch it.
These 1 month loans are far from optimal. Munster seem terrified of another Mike Ross debacle. Imagine where Ryan would be now if he had been retained even on a 3 month spell? Archer has been shocking again this season, but in spite of Ryan's good showing at LI he's barely had a sniff of a chance.
Thing is with the variety of time at various clubs all we're doing is putting the lad in the shop window and allowing a selection of clubs to try before they buy
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
How does that benefit us though, in the long run?
Imagine, if Ryan had had 3 fantastic months at LI then we could have confidently seen him dropped right into the HEC squad for Sarries a la Bent at Leinster. Instead, he's twiddled his thumbs for 2 months, while watching Archer snap, crackle and pop in the scrum. Condon and Archer got destroyed by a couple of kids in the A game, while Ryan was stuck at loose head; which would be a lesson learned, if Ryan was starting on Sunday.
Not trying to say it's a positive at all, if anything it is a negative because if we don't do something to convince him to stay then why would he? But on the other side, at least for once we're seeing a guy getting rugby instead of warming benches for 70 minutes
\"A million monkeys with a million crayons would be hard-pressed in a million years to create anything as cretinous as Battlefield Earth.\"
Agreed. But the initial point I was making was that if it was written in stone - which clearly it was - that Archer was going to get all back-up BJ game time, however poorly he performed, then wouldn't it have been better back in late August to have sent Ryan to LI and/or Cotter to London Welsh for 3 months (with a break clause)?
It may have been, but I'm not sure either of the clubs would have been looking for them for that period.
Open to correction on this, but LI's need for a TH came from injuries, with Bath's seemingly coming from being off-guard by Wilson's international call up (?)
Funnily enough, it may be Archer who would benefit us more having 20 minutes here and there in the AP.
AFAIK if a player is on 3 month contract he could be submitted to the ERC as a squad member, but on a 1-2 month deal he wouldn't be eligible. Munster may be simply trying to avoid the players getting cup-tied in case there's a major run of injuries back here. We've seen enough instances over the years when we suddenly get a string of players being injured in one particular position.
#13's in 2006, the #7's at the start of this season.
I think Bath had some injury issues as well which is why cotter went over.
Plato: \"One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.\"
Cotter got 5 minutes tonight for Bath. I missed it but good to see him getting a run.
\"In a world gone mad, only a lunatic is truly insane\"