munster_mafia wrote: skulldrag wrote: munster_mafia wrote: I will now recommend the hurt locker, excellent movie. Frightfully overrated. This is one film that really really won't age well. I'm willing to bet in 5 years time when you are looking at the finale you will be thinking "this chase scene is like an episode of The Unit or 24. Why was this seen as the great Iraq war film? We might as well have given the title to 3 Kings" I couldnt care less what people think of it in 5 years as long as i enjoyed it now.

Watched it last night and thought it was good enough.

Not really a broad statement on the Iraq war though. More a story about the boys than the war. Obviously it hangs over their situations but it doesn't try to make a massive statement. Or if it does I'm to dumb to see it. 

Ruck wrote: The Word Is Born wrote: For those of you that were horrified at the prospect of Will Smith eating a live octopus and having sex with his daughter I'm afraid to inform you of a new danger called "Let Me In"- a remake of "Let The Right One In". In yet another example of the USA being a country populated with f**kwits and mongs the title was changed because;<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"> The American version is called </span><i style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Let Me In<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"> because the publishers requested that Lindqvist change the title as they believed it was too long. Link</span>Dumb it down because f**kwits can't read a title more than 3 words and completely lose the meaning of the title/film. Again, f**kwits of the highest order.<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"></span> Thank god they cancelled "oldboy". I shudder to imagine what they'd have done to it.

"Sylvester Stallone plays a man mysteriously imprisoned in a room....."

Avatar

This is what 3D was created for, really enjoyed this movie plot is a bit cheesie and done to death before but the special effects and watching it in 3D make this a real enjoyable cinema experience.

Ruck wrote: POC Lost Tooth wrote: Ruck wrote: The Word Is Born wrote: For those of you that were horrified at the prospect of Will Smith eating a live octopus and having sex with his daughter I'm afraid to inform you of a new danger called "Let Me In"- a remake of "Let The Right One In". In yet another example of the USA being a country populated with f**kwits and mongs the title was changed because;<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"> The American version is called </span><i style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;">Let Me In<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"> because the publishers requested that Lindqvist change the title as they believed it was too long. Link</span>Dumb it down because f**kwits can't read a title more than 3 words and completely lose the meaning of the title/film. Again, f**kwits of the highest order.<span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"></span> Thank god they cancelled "oldboy". I shudder to imagine what they'd have done to it. "Sylvester Stallone plays a man mysteriously imprisoned in a room....." It was Will f**king Smith that they had cast as the main character.

Holy sch ite, clowns!!!

I'm not sure if the great special effect make up for watching an updated Pocahontas

You've got skills Krusty

Was a bit hesitant about going to see Avatar , eventually got around to it last saturday night, the story and dialogue could be stronger, it some respects thats irrelevant because its absolutely stunning,  the special effects alone are worth going to see , 3D may be here to stay.